Smart Automation vs. Tech Installation: Two Worlds Apart in Manufacturing

In manufacturing, particularly in regulated industries, there's a difference between simply installing automation technology and implementing truly transformative automation systems. After guiding dozens of clients through this journey, we've identified key distinctions that separate breakthrough successes from expensive disappointments.

‍

1. Starting with Purpose, Not Products

This is not strategic automation: Implementing technology without clear business objectives

Many manufacturers rush to adopt the latest automation platforms without defining the specific operational problems they must solve. These investments often deliver impressive technical capabilities but disappointing business results.

This is strategic automation: Beginning with precise operational challenges

When Cargill needed to replace an obsolete Distributed Control System, it didn't just focus on new hardware. It identified the core challenge: maintaining continuous production during the transition. This clarity led it to develop a digital twin environment that reduced migration downtime by 80% while improving product quality immediately after startup.

‍

2. From Data Overload to Actionable Intelligence

This is not effective data utilization: Collecting information without context

Manufacturing environments generate mountains of data that often remain siloed and underutilized. According to a recent study, large companies effectively use only about 51% of their available data.

This is effective data utilization: Creating integrated intelligence ecosystems

One of the world's top pharma manufacturing player facilities faced this challenge with two distinct production zones containing heterogeneous equipment. Implementing a redundant Kepware OPC architecture that unified data collection brought together 4,000+ industrial tags into a structured system. This integration reduced batch losses, saving tens of thousands of euros annually through optimized process monitoring.

‍

3. Compliance: Burden or Advantage?

This is not compliance-friendly automation: Treating regulations as obstacles

Traditional approaches handle compliance as separate processes layered onto production, creating duplicate work and friction that slows everything down.

This is compliance-friendly automation: Building regulations into system architecture

AGC Pharma Chemicals faced an unprecedented challenge: implementing next-generation web-based DCS technology in a pharmaceutical environment where no such system had ever been validated. Rather than seeing GMP requirements as limitations, they developed a pioneering validation framework that made compliance part of the foundation. This approach created the world's first validated PCS neo installation in a pharmaceutical facility, turning regulatory requirements into a competitive edge.  

‍4. People and Technology: Competition or Collaboration?

This is not workforce-enhancing automation: Focusing primarily on labor reduction

When automation projects aim to eliminate workers rather than enhance their capabilities, they often face resistance and miss valuable process insights that only experienced operators can provide.

This is workforce-enhancing automation: Elevating human capabilities through technology

At Tersa's waste-to-energy plant, operators were involved from the beginning of the control system migration. This involvement unlocked critical process knowledge while creating ownership. The system enhanced rather than replaced human capabilities—operators evolved from routine tasks to process optimization, resulting in a more precise, agile operation.

Manufacturers pursuing this collaborative approach directly address what Deloitte identifies as one of the industry's top challenges: nearly 60% of manufacturers struggle with talent acquisition and retention.

‍

5. Implementation: Revolution or Evolution?

This is not effective implementation: Attempting "big bang" transformations

Large-scale implementations that try to change everything simultaneously create unnecessary risk and often lead to extended production disruptions when unexpected issues arise.

This is effective implementation: Strategic evolution through targeted, high-impact phases

It took a measured approach when Dara-Lyo (formerly Coolvacuum) needed to digitalize its freeze-drying operations while meeting FDA compliance requirements. Starting with a thorough analysis of regulatory requirements, it developed a template-based SCADA architecture that could be efficiently deployed across different freeze-dryer models. This standardized approach significantly reduced development time for new installations while ensuring consistent compliance.

‍

The Bottom Line: Results That Matter

The difference between these approaches isn't just philosophical—it translates directly to business outcomes:

• Projects built on clear business alignment deliver measurable value from day one
• Integrated data architectures enable rapid troubleshooting and process optimization
• Compliance-embedded automation reduces regulatory burden while improving documentation
• Workforce-enhancing implementations improve both productivity and employee retention
• Evolutionary approaches minimize disruption while accelerating innovation

Industry research confirms this impact: manufacturers implementing advanced automation technologies have experienced a 16% increase in productivity and a 12% reduction in operational costs.

‍

Moving From Installation to Transformation

As you evaluate your automation strategy, consider which approach better describes your current initiatives. Are you installing technology, or are you genuinely transforming operations?

The most successful manufacturers view automation not as a technology project but as a business transformation enabled by technology. Manufacturers can transform automation from a helpful tool into a decisive competitive advantage by focusing on strategic alignment, integrated data, embedded compliance, enhanced human capabilities, and measured evolution.

‍

‍